We think about college football 24/7 so you don't have to.

Posts Tagged ‘Michigan State’

The Big Ten’s 2012 Non-Conference Schedule

After looking at the non-conference schedules found in the SEC, let’s turn our attention to the Big Ten, where every school but one, Nebraska, has filled out its dance card for the coming season. The Cornhuskers are close: three games down, one to go. And considering how Nebraska’s scheduled trio of games look, there’s little doubt that the program will look to fill that open date with the easiest, most cupcake-like opponent available on that particular Saturday — that would be Sept. 22, by the way, if you’re a lower-level program looking to plop a six-figure check in the school coffers. And the F.C.S. is certainly in the conversation: Nebraska has played one such school in each of the last two years after not doing so from 2007-9.

Continue Reading »

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
     Share   |   Comment   Comments (7)   |   Home  Home

    All’s Fair in Love, War and Recruiting

    Forget about the fact that Urban Meyer has only been at Ohio State for two months, because it doesn’t matter. Ignore the fact that he’s still seven months away from actually leading the Buckeyes onto the field in a game that counts, because it doesn’t mean a thing. Meyer may be new in town, but that hasn’t stopped him from climbing into the head of nearly every coach in the Big Ten, thanks to a national signing day haul that left all but Michigan’s Brady Hoke in the dust. It’s Hoke, after all, who went toe-to-toe with Ohio State’s newly-minted recruiting giant and more than held his own; it’s also Hoke, reached for comment yesterday, who told an Ohio television station that recruits who have given another program their verbal commitment are still fair game.

    Continue Reading »

    Tags: , , , , , , , ,
       Share   |   Comment   Comments (8)   |   Home  Home

      P.S.R. 1-120: Final Re-Ranking

      With the season in the books, here’s a look at how the country ranks — using the original rankings as the starting point, with the year’s results as rationale for any movement. The top 25 teams land a one-sentence breakdown. The rest? Not so much. Part of the perks of being one of the best. Think your team is too low? Feel another team deserves more credit, less credit? Let’s hear it below. It’s a delicate ranking process, but with the year completely in the books, this is as good as it’s going to get.

      Continue Reading »

      Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
         Share   |   Comment   Comments (11)   |   Home  Home

        Bowl Travesties, from V.T. to W.K.U.

        The Hokies should have been given one easy path to the B.C.S.: defeat Clemson, go to the Orange Bowl. A two-loss Virginia Tech team that beat East Carolina by a touchdown and Duke by four points should not be part of the B.C.S. bowl slate. In addition, the nation’s second-weakest B.C.S. conference should not be sending two teams to B.C.S. play. In selecting Virginia Tech, the B.C.S. selection committees passed over four teams, Boise State and Kansas State, ranked in the top 10 of the final B.C.S. standings. The Hokies were ranked 11th.

        Continue Reading »

        Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
           Share   |   Comment   Comments (30)   |   Home  Home

          Wisconsin Bounces Back From October

          Like all great teams, Wisconsin rebounded from a midseason stumble by playing football as if nothing had gone wrong. This ability to withstand adversity stems from two of Wisconsin’s most advantageous traits: one, the Badgers are good as any team in the country; and two, the Badgers know they’re as good as any team in the country. Call it cockiness, though that’s likely going a step too far. It’s confidence, not cockiness, and it’s the sort of well-deserved and well-earned confidence that comes with the knowledge that as good as they were in 2010, the Badgers are even better in 2011.

          Continue Reading »

          Tags: , , ,
             Share   |   Comment   Comments (3)   |   Home  Home

            My 2011 Defensive All-American Ballot

            Picking all-American teams isn’t easy, believe it or not. You only have so many slots to fill: 11 starters on a defense, 11 players you can pick. So it’s only natural that a player or two — or three, or four — fall by the wayside, and for every 11 players you pick for your team it’s only natural that there are at least another 11 players worthy of heavy consideration. There is no second-team on a voters’ ballot; just 11 guys, and pick ‘em as you see ‘em. I filled out the defensive half of my all-American ballot yesterday — three days late for the deadline, so it may not even count. Here are the picks:

            Continue Reading »

            Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
               Share   |   Comment   Comments (2)   |   Home  Home

              As if Picking the Teams Isn’t Hard Enough

              I’ve never tried my hand at projecting the entire F.B.S. bowl slate; I have enough trouble with the five B.C.S. games, in my mind. But it’s worth a shot for one week, even if I mess up the various tie-ins, conference affiliations and so forth. Not to mention choose teams that end up staying home during bowl play. Well, here goes. Remember: those numbers signifying which team slots where in its conference are very arbitrary — to a point. The No. 7 team isn’t vaulting the No. 3 team, but No. 6 could be No. 4, No. 5 could be No. 7 and so on. And not every conference can meet its allotted bowl tie-ins; in that case, a substitute team is selected.

              Continue Reading »

              Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
                 Share   |   Comment   Comments (10)   |   Home  Home

                Ten Themes for Saturday: Week 9

                Ten teams, themes, players and games to watch on Saturday. Pretty straightforward. Here we go:

                Par for the course This is pretty typical for the Pac-12 in 2011: all 12 teams are in action, but only one game, Stanford at U.S.C., pits two teams with a winning record. The rest is a minefield of potentially unwatchable football. Washington State, 3-4, heads to Oregon, 6-1, and the results will be ugly — nice for Oregon, disastrous for the Cougars. Colorado, 1-7, heads to Arizona State, 5-2, and the same said of Washington State can be said of the Buffaloes. Then there’s 4-3 California at 3-4 U.C.L.A.; the latter is a train wreck. Oregon State’s playing better football, but at 2-5, the Beavers — who visit 3-4 Utah — are facing an uphill climb to bowl eligibility. This is just another weekend in the Pac-12, where the great teams are really great but the bad teams… well, they’re pretty bad.

                Continue Reading »

                Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
                   Share   |   Comment   Comments (2)   |   Home  Home
                  Next Page »« Previous Page

                  The Countdown

                  A bottom-to-top assessment of the F.B.S. landscape heading into the 2012 season.