Guerrero-Led U.C.L.A. Is Taking on Water
By Paul Myerberg // Dec 9, 2011
It’s been 12 days since the news first broke, a week since it was official, and U.C.L.A. is still lost at sea. While the rest of the Pac-12 — outside of Arizona State — is moving and shaking, the Bruins are treading water. Of course, anyone familiar with athletic director Dan Guerrero should have expected nothing else: Guerrero, since arriving in 2002, has been responsible for firing Bob Toledo, hiring Karl Dorrell, firing Dorrell, hiring Rick Neuheisel and then, a week ago, firing Neuheisel. This is par for the course. As is the parade of names, some noteworthy for good reasons, most noteworthy for not, and U.C.L.A. is getting nervous. The fan base is running out of fingernails.
The latest coach to make the wires, former Falcons and Seahawks coach Jim Mora, possesses a year-by-year record that reads like an eye chart: 11-5, 8-8, 7-9, 5-11. The wins get smaller the farther down you go. But this is U.C.L.A., and this is Guerrero, and the latter’s history of bumbling the steps needed to create a winning football program does not give many reason for optimism.
U.C.L.A. has had months to prepare for this search. Neuheisel was gone, for all intents and purposes, the Thursday his team suffered a 48-12 loss to an Arizona team days removed from the firing of its own coach, Mike Stoops. This was no ordinary loss; the Bruins rolled over and died, and there was no way Neuheisel — barring eight straight wins — was coming back in 2012.
Yet Guerrero made no moves. At roughly the same time, Washington State athletic director Bill Moos experienced his own come-to-the-light moment. The Cougars were improving under Paul Wulff, just not on the pace Moos expected heading into 2011. So Moos, in November, began to lay the groundwork.
It’s been suggested that Moos reached out to Mike Leach as early as mid-November, gauging his interest in the job in Pullman in 2012. Leach reciprocated his interest. Here’s guessing that Moos knew that he’d be swapping Wulff for Leach by the time he boarded his plane to return to the Pacific Northwest.
As noted, Arizona knew by late October that it would be in the market for a new head coach in 2012. Athletic director Greg Byrne, making his first major coaching hire for the Wildcats, aced the whole search: he called in big names, drew interest from several candidates and landed the best option — outside of Urban Meyer — on Arizona’s radar.
Yet the Bruins have done nothing. Guerrero and the university should have known Neuheisel was working on borrowed time; Guerrero himself said on Oct. 18 that “returning to a bowl is just one of several steps we need to take to get this program to the level we all desire.” With the current coach firmly affixed to the hot seat, why didn’t U.C.L.A. begin investigating future options in early November, if not sooner?
Guerrero and the Bruins are adrift. Lost without a paddle. In deep water, and the only possible conclusion is this: U.C.L.A. has no idea what it’s doing. How else can you explain a search that started without a plan and has rapidly deteriorated into a free-for-all — worse yet, a search that seems to have no endgame? Hiring Jim Mora can’t be the grand plan, can it?
It started well, if fruitlessly. Guerrero covered his bases and called Chris Petersen, knowing he’d probably say no, but you can’t fault the effort. Petersen said no, of course. Then Al Golden, the coach U.C.L.A. should have hired in 2007. Golden, fresh off a contract extension, indicated no interest in the opportunity. When time travel does become a reality, U.C.L.A.’s first stop should be Temple, 2007. Or Boise, 2005. But I digress.
What next? Nothing. Well, something: Mora. This is a coach who wore out his welcome in Atlanta in three years, thanks in part to the touch that led the Falcons from within one win of the Super Bowl to back-to-back non-winning seasons. Mora lasted four months with the Seahawks in 2009, leaving three years and $12 million remaining on his contract. At neither stop did he — how to put this — endear himself to his team, bosses or fan base.
Nevertheless, all signs point to Mora. He’s Guerrero’s pick, which counts for something — it counts for everything, in fact. If he’s the choice, U.C.L.A. will go from a coach who wanted nothing more than to be in Westwood to a coach who wore out his welcome at each of his major stops.
U.C.L.A. would be hiring a coach who is 27 years removed from the college game: Mora’s lone college stop came in 1984, when he spent one season as a graduate assistant at Washington, his alma mater. Since then, Mora’s closest brush with the F.B.S. came in 2006, when he called into a Seattle-area radio show to express his interest in the job with the Huskies. A job that wasn’t available at the time. At the time, Mora was still the coach of the Falcons.
The coaching search has become a joke, though the U.C.L.A. fan base isn’t smiling. Unfortunately, it seems as if Guerrero will have the last laugh: despite several woefully misguided coaching hires, Guerrero continues to lead the way at the forefront of one of the most prestigious athletic departments in college sports.
I can see the future. Guerrero will hire Mora, drawing extreme ire and antipathy from a fan base that expected better. The athletic department, in turn, will dismiss all negative feedback. Mora will first crash, then burn, and U.C.L.A. will be back in same boat. Guerrero will handle the search for Mora’s replacement as well. Forget treading water: U.C.L.A. is taking on water.
You can also follow Paul Myerberg and Pre-Snap Read on Twitter.
Tags: Arizona, Bill Moos, Dan Guerrero, Jim Mora, Mike Leach, Rick Neuheisel, U.C.L.A., Washington State
Leave a Comment